Wimbledon’s Open Era began in 1968 and has produced periods of exceptional dominance alongside memorable changes of champion. Ten charts explore the countries represented by winners, player height, decisive tournament performances and the differences between men’s and women’s finals. A reference table records all 112 singles finals held from 1968 to 2024.
The main results stop at 2024. The retained semi-finalist height series ends in 2019, and the game-win ranking remains a historical selection. Titles, different champions and tournament appearances are counted separately. Country affiliation is not country of birth.
Statistics
- Different men’s champions by country, 1968–2024
- Average height of men’s semi-finalists, 1968–2019
- Selected champions with the highest game-win percentages
- Leading men’s title totals across the amateur and Open eras
- Different women’s champions by country, 1968–2024
- Women with the most Open Era singles titles, 1968–2024
- Who won the men’s titles in each decade?
- Finals requiring a deciding set, by decade
- First Open Era title or repeat winner?
- From first to last title: champions with at least five Open Era wins
- Wimbledon singles finals reference table
1. Different men’s champions by country, 1968–2024
USA — 6Australia — 4Sweden — 2Spain — 2Czechoslovakia — 1Other countries — 7
The countries producing the most different champions are not always those with the largest number of titles. The United States and Australia have several names in the Open Era winners’ list, while Switzerland’s remarkable title record is concentrated in Roger Federer. Sweden combines the achievements of Björn Borg and Stefan Edberg, whose successes belong to different periods.
This distinction separates breadth from repeated dominance. A country with several champions has seen different players reach the top, whereas one exceptional player can account for many championships over a long career. Neither pattern alone explains how a tennis system develops talent, since players train and compete internationally and follow individual paths. The distribution nevertheless offers a useful way to understand Wimbledon’s changing geographical reach. Established tennis nations remain prominent, while champions from other countries broaden the record. Each new name adds a different career to the history, even when the number of trophies remains heavily concentrated among a few great players.
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record. Each player counted once, under the country shown at their first Open Era title. Five largest country groups plus Other; ties ordered by first appearance.
2. Average height of men’s semi-finalists, 1968–2019
The average height of the four men reaching the semi-finals varies from year to year, but the later part of this series generally sits above the earliest years. The increase is not smooth. A tournament featuring several particularly tall players can lift the average sharply, while a different set of semi-finalists can bring it back down the following year.
Height can affect serve angles, reach and movement, yet it is only one part of grass-court performance. Timing, return quality, court positioning and the ability to handle pressure remain important, and successful players have combined those skills in different physical profiles. The annual fluctuations are a reminder that four players form a small group, strongly influenced by the draw and the progress of particular contenders. The longer pattern suggests a changing physical profile at the top of the men’s competition, while the variation shows that no single height defines the route to a Wimbledon semi-final.
Historical semi-finalist series supplied with the page, 52 years from 1968 to 2019. Values previously showed centimetres above 175; 175 has been added back to show actual mean height. The underlying player-height roster has not been independently reconstructed. The former 2022 end-date was incorrect.
3. Selected champions with the highest game-win percentages
John McEnroe’s 1984 title leads this historical selection by the proportion of games won across the tournament. Arthur Ashe’s 1975 victory also stands out, while several Roger Federer championships appear among the strongest performances. The list brings together different styles and eras, showing that dominance can be expressed through more than one approach to grass-court tennis.
Winning a high share of games means that a champion usually kept opponents under substantial pressure throughout the event. It is different from simply winning every match, which all champions must do. A player can survive several close encounters and still lift the trophy, while another moves through the draw with a much larger margin. The percentage therefore adds a perspective on how emphatic a title run was. It does not adjust for opponents, draw difficulty or changes in playing conditions, so the figures are best read as descriptions of particular performances rather than a complete ranking of champions across generations.
Historical ten-performance selection retained from the page. Games won as a percentage of games played during the title run; this is not match-win percentage. The source does not provide a complete match-by-match calculation, so the ranking is not presented as an updated all-time audit.
Roger Federer appears several times in the game-win comparison, reflecting the strength of different Wimbledon title runs. His career also demonstrates the difference between winning one tournament emphatically and sustaining success over many seasons. Grass-court tennis rewards the ability to serve effectively, take time away from opponents and respond quickly as points develop. Federer combined those demands with a varied attacking game. The photograph places one of the leading names in the statistics on the court where those results were earned, connecting the percentages with the movement and decisions that make up a match.
4. Leading men’s title totals across the amateur and Open eras
Open EraAmateur era
Roger Federer leads these men’s title totals with eight championships, all won in the Open Era. Pete Sampras and Novak Djokovic follow with seven, while William Renshaw’s seven belong to the earlier amateur period. Rod Laver and John Newcombe bridge the divide, with titles on both sides of the change in eligibility.
The split is important because Wimbledon’s competitive structure changed over its long history. Earlier champions played under different entry rules and, in some periods, a challenge-round system that gave the defending champion a different route to the final. Open Era totals come from a competition open to professionals as well as amateurs. The names can therefore be placed together as part of the tournament’s history without assuming that every title involved an identical task. What they share is repeated success at the same championship. Their records show how a small group of players became closely associated with Wimbledon across very different generations.
Selected historical leaders, totals through 2024; Open Era begins in 1968. Amateur-era and Open Era titles are separated. Before 1922, the challenge round affected the defending champion’s route. Source: Wimbledon champions record and the supplied title table.
5. Different women’s champions by country, 1968–2024
USA — 6Czechia — 4Australia — 3Britain — 2Spain — 2Other countries — 8
The women’s winners’ list includes champions from a broad range of countries. The United States has supplied several major figures, while European and Australian players also form important parts of the record. Counting different champions reveals the variety of careers behind the titles, rather than allowing one long winning run to dominate the national comparison.
A new champion can mark a generational change, but it can also emerge during a period when an established player remains highly competitive. Wimbledon’s history contains both repeated winners and players who seized a single opportunity to take the title. National affiliation adds another layer because careers and identities can cross borders, and some champions represented different countries at different points. The distribution is therefore a record of the affiliation attached to a first title, not a statement about birthplace or the sole source of a player’s development. It highlights how widely success has been shared among individual women while preserving the distinction between people and trophies.
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record. Each woman counted once under the country recorded at her first Open Era title. Historical affiliations remain distinct; five largest groups plus Other.
6. Women with the most Open Era singles titles, 1968–2024
Martina Navratilova’s nine Open Era singles titles place her ahead of the other women in this comparison. Serena Williams and Steffi Graf each won seven, while Venus Williams also built a substantial Wimbledon record. Their totals show how strongly the tournament’s modern history has been shaped by players who returned to win repeatedly.
Sustained success requires a player to remain competitive as opponents, equipment and personal circumstances change. A title won early in a career may be followed by years of pressure and adaptation before another victory arrives. The leading totals therefore describe more than one outstanding fortnight: they reflect repeated opportunities converted into championships. At the same time, the list includes players with fewer titles whose victories were central moments in their own careers and in the tournament’s history. Comparing the totals helps identify the longest periods of success, while the annual results preserve the individual finals that made those records possible.
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record.
Martina Navratilova’s nine singles titles make her the leading woman in the Open Era Wimbledon comparison. Her success was built around an attacking game that brought her forward and placed pressure on opponents. A photograph on the practice courts also points to the preparation behind the championship record. Repeated victories require work between tournaments as well as performance during the fortnight itself. Navratilova’s place in the statistics therefore connects exceptional results with a career sustained over many seasons, during which she continued to adapt while remaining closely associated with the demands of grass-court tennis.
7. Who won the men’s titles in each decade?
Roger FedererPete SamprasNovak DjokovicBjörn BorgJohn McEnroeOther champions
The men’s championship contains several clear periods of dominance. Björn Borg’s victories define the late 1970s, Pete Sampras is strongly associated with the 1990s, and Roger Federer’s repeated successes shape the following decade. Novak Djokovic adds another long period of achievement, while the other champions ensure that no era is entirely the story of one player.
Decade boundaries divide careers into convenient periods, but a player’s strongest years do not necessarily begin or end with a round-number date. Some champions bridge two decades, and others win between the most concentrated runs. The pattern is therefore best understood as overlapping careers rather than a sequence of perfectly separate reigns. It shows how repeated success can give a period a distinctive identity, while individual victories by other players interrupt or precede those runs. The result is a history that combines long-term consistency with moments when a different contender takes control of the championship.
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record.
8. Finals requiring a deciding set, by decade
Men: five setsWomen: three sets
A final that reaches its deciding set leaves the title unresolved until the last possible stage of the match. The frequency of those contests varies across decades in both events. Some periods contain several extended finals, while others are more often settled before the final set is needed.
Men’s and women’s singles use different match lengths, so a deciding set means a fifth set for men and a third for women. In both cases it signals that the finalists have split the earlier sets evenly, but it does not necessarily mean that every set was close. A straight-sets final can also contain tight games and tie-breaks. The comparison therefore describes one specific form of competitive balance rather than the total drama of a match. It helps distinguish periods in which the finalists regularly pushed each other to the limit of the format, while leaving room for the many other ways a championship match can remain memorable.
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record. Percentage of finals requiring five sets for men or three for women, calculated from the recorded score. Partial 1960s and 2020s; no 2020 final.
9. First Open Era title or repeat winner?
First Open Era titleRepeat Open Era title
Repeat winners account for a substantial part of Wimbledon’s Open Era history. Once a player has won a first title, further victories add to an established championship career rather than introducing a new name to the record. First-time Open Era winners represent the moments when the list of champions expands.
The balance between these outcomes reflects the strength of leading players and the opportunities available to challengers. A small number of dominant champions can accumulate many trophies, while a more open period allows several players to take their first title. The comparison also has a historical boundary: a player who won before 1968 can still record a first Open Era victory later. It therefore describes new winners within this period rather than every player’s first Wimbledon title of any kind. Read alongside the individual rankings, the totals show how a long competition can combine a relatively limited group of repeat champions with regular additions to its list of winners.
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record. “First” means first title within 1968–2024, not necessarily first career Wimbledon title. Each event has 56 completed championships.
Centre Court is the setting in which Wimbledon’s singles champions are decided. The first-time and repeat-winner comparison brings together many different finals played across the Open Era, each ending with one player adding a title to their career. The court links those changing generations through a shared venue, even as facilities and playing conditions have evolved. For an established champion it can be a familiar stage; for a first-time finalist it represents a new opportunity. The photograph gives a physical setting to the recurring contest between experience at the highest level and the arrival of another contender.
10. From first to last title: champions with at least five Open Era wins
The span between a champion’s first and last title shows how long their Wimbledon success remained relevant. Some players concentrated their victories into a relatively short run, while others returned to win after longer gaps. A broad span therefore describes durability across seasons, but it does not imply that the player won every year within it.
Maintaining a route back to the title can involve changes in training, tactics and expectations as a career develops. Younger opponents arrive, injuries can interrupt progress and the demands of the wider tour continue between Wimbledon appearances. The leading champions responded to those pressures in different ways. Comparing their winning spans places the familiar title totals within a longer career story, showing both concentrated dominance and success renewed over time. It also brings men’s and women’s records into the same chronological view without treating their match formats as identical. Each span marks the years between two championship achievements, with the intervening history recorded separately.
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record. Players with at least five Open Era singles titles. Bars span first title year through the end of the last title year; gaps between wins remain inside the bar. These are career winning spans, not consecutive winning streaks.
11. Wimbledon singles finals reference table
112 finals, 1968–2024; 2020 was cancelled. Scroll horizontally and vertically. Title number counts from 1968, so earlier amateur titles are excluded. Scores are listed from the champion’s perspective.
| Year | Event | Champion | Champion country | Runner-up | Runner-up country | Final score | Sets played | Champion’s Open Era title number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1968 | Men | Rod Laver | Australia | Tony Roche | Australia | 6–3, 6–4, 6–2 | 3 | 1 |
| 1968 | Women | Billie Jean King | USA | Judy Tegart | Australia | 9–7, 7–5 | 2 | 1 |
| 1969 | Men | Rod Laver | Australia | John Newcombe | Australia | 6–4, 5–7, 6–4, 6–4 | 4 | 2 |
| 1969 | Women | Ann Jones | Britain | Billie Jean King | USA | 3–6, 6–3, 6–2 | 3 | 1 |
| 1970 | Men | John Newcombe | Australia | Ken Rosewall | Australia | 5–7, 6–3, 6–2, 3–6, 6–1 | 5 | 1 |
| 1970 | Women | Margaret Court | Australia | Billie Jean King | USA | 14–12, 11–9 | 2 | 1 |
| 1971 | Men | John Newcombe | Australia | Stan Smith | USA | 6–3, 5–7, 2–6, 6–4, 6–4 | 5 | 2 |
| 1971 | Women | Evonne Goolagong | Australia | Margaret Court | Australia | 6–4, 6–1 | 2 | 1 |
| 1972 | Men | Stan Smith | USA | Ilie Năstase | Romania | 4–6, 6–3, 6–3, 4–6, 7–5 | 5 | 1 |
| 1972 | Women | Billie Jean King | USA | Evonne Goolagong | Australia | 6–3, 6–3 | 2 | 2 |
| 1973 | Men | Jan Kodeš | Czechoslovakia | Alex Metreveli | URS | 6–1, 9–8(7–5), 6–3 | 3 | 1 |
| 1973 | Women | Billie Jean King | USA | Chris Evert | USA | 6–0, 7–5 | 2 | 3 |
| 1974 | Men | Jimmy Connors | USA | Ken Rosewall | Australia | 6–1, 6–1, 6–4 | 3 | 1 |
| 1974 | Women | Chris Evert | USA | Olga Morozova | URS | 6–0, 6–4 | 2 | 1 |
| 1975 | Men | Arthur Ashe | USA | Jimmy Connors | USA | 6–1, 6–1, 5–7, 6–4 | 4 | 1 |
| 1975 | Women | Billie Jean King | USA | Evonne Goolagong | Australia | 6–0, 6–1 | 2 | 4 |
| 1976 | Men | Björn Borg | Sweden | Ilie Năstase | Romania | 6–4, 6–2, 9–7 | 3 | 1 |
| 1976 | Women | Chris Evert | USA | Evonne Goolagong | Australia | 6–3, 4–6, 8–6 | 3 | 2 |
| 1977 | Men | Björn Borg | Sweden | Jimmy Connors | USA | 3–6, 6–2, 6–1, 5–7, 6–4 | 5 | 2 |
| 1977 | Women | Virginia Wade | Britain | Betty Stöve | Netherlands | 4–6, 6–3, 6–1 | 3 | 1 |
| 1978 | Men | Björn Borg | Sweden | Jimmy Connors | USA | 6–2, 6–2, 6–3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1978 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Chris Evert | USA | 2–6, 6–4, 7–5 | 3 | 1 |
| 1979 | Men | Björn Borg | Sweden | Roscoe Tanner | USA | 6–7(4–7), 6–1, 3–6, 6–3, 6–4 | 5 | 4 |
| 1979 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Chris Evert | USA | 6–4, 6–4 | 2 | 2 |
| 1980 | Men | Björn Borg | Sweden | John McEnroe | USA | 1–6, 7–5, 6–3, 6–7(16–18), 8–6 | 5 | 5 |
| 1980 | Women | Evonne Goolagong | Australia | Chris Evert | USA | 6–1, 7–6(7–4) | 2 | 2 |
| 1981 | Men | John McEnroe | USA | Björn Borg | Sweden | 4–6, 7–6(7–1), 7–6(7–4), 6–4 | 4 | 1 |
| 1981 | Women | Chris Evert | USA | Hana Mandlíková | TCH[i] | 6–2, 6–2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1982 | Men | Jimmy Connors | USA | John McEnroe | USA | 3–6, 6–3, 6–7(2–7), 7–6(7–5), 6–4 | 5 | 2 |
| 1982 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Chris Evert | USA | 6–1, 3–6, 6–2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1983 | Men | John McEnroe | USA | Chris Lewis | NZL | 6–2, 6–2, 6–2 | 3 | 2 |
| 1983 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Andrea Jaeger | USA | 6–0, 6–3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1984 | Men | John McEnroe | USA | Jimmy Connors | USA | 6–1, 6–1, 6–2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1984 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Chris Evert | USA | 7–6(7–5), 6–2 | 2 | 5 |
| 1985 | Men | Boris Becker | West Germany | Kevin Curren | USA | 6–3, 6–7(4–7), 7–6(7–3), 6–4 | 4 | 1 |
| 1985 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Chris Evert | USA | 4–6, 6–3, 6–2 | 3 | 6 |
| 1986 | Men | Boris Becker | West Germany | Ivan Lendl | Czechoslovakia | 6–4, 6–3, 7–5 | 3 | 2 |
| 1986 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Hana Mandlíková | Czechoslovakia | 7–6(7–1), 6–3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1987 | Men | Pat Cash | Australia | Ivan Lendl | Czechoslovakia | 7–6(7–5), 6–2, 7–5 | 3 | 1 |
| 1987 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Steffi Graf | FRG[j] | 7–5, 6–3 | 2 | 8 |
| 1988 | Men | Stefan Edberg | Sweden | Boris Becker | West Germany | 4–6, 7–6(7–2), 6–4, 6–2 | 4 | 1 |
| 1988 | Women | Steffi Graf | West Germany | Martina Navratilova | USA | 5–7, 6–2, 6–1 | 3 | 1 |
| 1989 | Men | Boris Becker | West Germany | Stefan Edberg | Sweden | 6–0, 7–6(7–1), 6–4 | 3 | 3 |
| 1989 | Women | Steffi Graf | West Germany | Martina Navratilova | USA | 6–2, 6–7(1–7), 6–1 | 3 | 2 |
| 1990 | Men | Stefan Edberg | Sweden | Boris Becker | West Germany | 6–2, 6–2, 3–6, 3–6, 6–4 | 5 | 2 |
| 1990 | Women | Martina Navratilova | USA | Zina Garrison | USA | 6–4, 6–1 | 2 | 9 |
| 1991 | Men | Michael Stich | Germany | Boris Becker | Germany | 6–4, 7–6(7–4), 6–4 | 3 | 1 |
| 1991 | Women | Steffi Graf | Germany | Gabriela Sabatini | ARG | 6–4, 3–6, 8–6 | 3 | 3 |
| 1992 | Men | Andre Agassi | USA | Goran Ivanišević | Croatia | 6–7(8–10), 6–4, 6–4, 1–6, 6–4 | 5 | 1 |
| 1992 | Women | Steffi Graf | Germany | Monica Seles | YUG | 6–2, 6–1 | 2 | 4 |
| 1993 | Men | Pete Sampras | USA | Jim Courier | USA | 7–6(7–3), 7–6(8–6), 3–6, 6–3 | 4 | 1 |
| 1993 | Women | Steffi Graf | Germany | Jana Novotná | Czechia | 7–6(8–6), 1–6, 6–4 | 3 | 5 |
| 1994 | Men | Pete Sampras | USA | Goran Ivanišević | Croatia | 7–6(7–2), 7–6(7–5), 6–0 | 3 | 2 |
| 1994 | Women | Conchita Martínez | Spain | Martina Navratilova | USA | 6–4, 3–6, 6–3 | 3 | 1 |
| 1995 | Men | Pete Sampras | USA | Boris Becker | Germany | 6–7(5–7), 6–2, 6–4, 6–2 | 4 | 3 |
| 1995 | Women | Steffi Graf | Germany | Arantxa Sánchez Vicario | Spain | 4–6, 6–1, 7–5 | 3 | 6 |
| 1996 | Men | Richard Krajicek | Netherlands | MaliVai Washington | USA | 6–3, 6–4, 6–3 | 3 | 1 |
| 1996 | Women | Steffi Graf | Germany | Arantxa Sánchez Vicario | Spain | 6–3, 7–5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1997 | Men | Pete Sampras | USA | Cédric Pioline | France | 6–4, 6–2, 6–4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1997 | Women | Martina Hingis | Switzerland | Jana Novotná | Czechia | 2–6, 6–3, 6–3 | 3 | 1 |
| 1998 | Men | Pete Sampras | USA | Goran Ivanišević | Croatia | 6–7(2–7), 7–6(11–9), 6–4, 3–6, 6–2 | 5 | 5 |
| 1998 | Women | Jana Novotná | Czechia | Nathalie Tauziat | France | 6–4, 7–6(7–2) | 2 | 1 |
| 1999 | Men | Pete Sampras | USA | Andre Agassi | USA | 6–3, 6–4, 7–5 | 3 | 6 |
| 1999 | Women | Lindsay Davenport | USA | Steffi Graf | Germany | 6–4, 7–5 | 2 | 1 |
| 2000 | Men | Pete Sampras | USA | Patrick Rafter | Australia | 6–7(10–12), 7–6(7–5), 6–4, 6–2 | 4 | 7 |
| 2000 | Women | Venus Williams | USA | Lindsay Davenport | USA | 6–3, 7–6(7–3) | 2 | 1 |
| 2001 | Men | Goran Ivanišević | Croatia | Patrick Rafter | Australia | 6–3, 3–6, 6–3, 2–6, 9–7 | 5 | 1 |
| 2001 | Women | Venus Williams | USA | Justine Henin | BEL | 6–1, 3–6, 6–0 | 3 | 2 |
| 2002 | Men | Lleyton Hewitt | Australia | David Nalbandian | ARG | 6–1, 6–3, 6–2 | 3 | 1 |
| 2002 | Women | Serena Williams | USA | Venus Williams | USA | 7–6(7–4), 6–3 | 2 | 1 |
| 2003 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Mark Philippoussis | Australia | 7–6(7–5), 6–2, 7–6(7–3) | 3 | 1 |
| 2003 | Women | Serena Williams | USA | Venus Williams | USA | 4–6, 6–4, 6–2 | 3 | 2 |
| 2004 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Andy Roddick | USA | 4–6, 7–5, 7–6(7–3), 6–4 | 4 | 2 |
| 2004 | Women | Maria Sharapova | Russia | Serena Williams | USA | 6–1, 6–4 | 2 | 1 |
| 2005 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Andy Roddick | USA | 6–2, 7–6(7–2), 6–4 | 3 | 3 |
| 2005 | Women | Venus Williams | USA | Lindsay Davenport | USA | 4–6, 7–6(7–4), 9–7 | 3 | 3 |
| 2006 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Rafael Nadal | Spain | 6–0, 7–6(7–5), 6–7(2–7), 6–3 | 4 | 4 |
| 2006 | Women | Amélie Mauresmo | France | Justine Henin | BEL | 2–6, 6–3, 6–4 | 3 | 1 |
| 2007 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Rafael Nadal | Spain | 7–6(9–7), 4–6, 7–6(7–3), 2–6, 6–2 | 5 | 5 |
| 2007 | Women | Venus Williams | USA | Marion Bartoli | France | 6–4, 6–1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2008 | Men | Rafael Nadal | Spain | Roger Federer | Switzerland | 6–4, 6–4, 6–7(5–7), 6–7(8–10), 9–7 | 5 | 1 |
| 2008 | Women | Venus Williams | USA | Serena Williams | USA | 7–5, 6–4 | 2 | 5 |
| 2009 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Andy Roddick | USA | 5–7, 7–6(8–6), 7–6(7–5), 3–6, 16–14 | 5 | 6 |
| 2009 | Women | Serena Williams | USA | Venus Williams | USA | 7–6(7–3), 6–2 | 2 | 3 |
| 2010 | Men | Rafael Nadal | Spain | Tomáš Berdych | Czechia | 6–3, 7–5, 6–4 | 3 | 2 |
| 2010 | Women | Serena Williams | USA | Vera Zvonareva | Russia | 6–3, 6–2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2011 | Men | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | Rafael Nadal | Spain | 6–4, 6–1, 1–6, 6–3 | 4 | 1 |
| 2011 | Women | Petra Kvitová | Czechia | Maria Sharapova | Russia | 6–3, 6–4 | 2 | 1 |
| 2012 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Andy Murray | Britain | 4–6, 7–5, 6–3, 6–4 | 4 | 7 |
| 2012 | Women | Serena Williams | USA | Agnieszka Radwańska | POL | 6–1, 5–7, 6–2 | 3 | 5 |
| 2013 | Men | Andy Murray | Britain | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | 6–4, 7–5, 6–4 | 3 | 1 |
| 2013 | Women | Marion Bartoli | France | Sabine Lisicki | Germany | 6–1, 6–4 | 2 | 1 |
| 2014 | Men | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | Roger Federer | Switzerland | 6–7(7–9), 6–4, 7–6(7–4), 5–7, 6–4 | 5 | 2 |
| 2014 | Women | Petra Kvitová | Czechia | Eugenie Bouchard | CAN | 6–3, 6–0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2015 | Men | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | Roger Federer | Switzerland | 7–6(7–1), 6–7(10–12), 6–4, 6–3 | 4 | 3 |
| 2015 | Women | Serena Williams | USA | Garbiñe Muguruza | Spain | 6–4, 6–4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2016 | Men | Andy Murray | Britain | Milos Raonic | CAN | 6–4, 7–6(7–3), 7–6(7–2) | 3 | 2 |
| 2016 | Women | Serena Williams | USA | Angelique Kerber | Germany | 7–5, 6–3 | 2 | 7 |
| 2017 | Men | Roger Federer | Switzerland | Marin Čilić | Croatia | 6–3, 6–1, 6–4 | 3 | 8 |
| 2017 | Women | Garbiñe Muguruza | Spain | Venus Williams | USA | 7–5, 6–0 | 2 | 1 |
| 2018 | Men | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | Kevin Anderson | RSA | 6–2, 6–2, 7–6(7–3) | 3 | 4 |
| 2018 | Women | Angelique Kerber | Germany | Serena Williams | USA | 6–3, 6–3 | 2 | 1 |
| 2019 | Men | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | Roger Federer | Switzerland | 7–6(7–5), 1–6, 7–6(7–4), 4–6, 13–12(7–3) | 5 | 5 |
| 2019 | Women | Simona Halep | Romania | Serena Williams | USA | 6–2, 6–2 | 2 | 1 |
| 2021 | Men | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | Matteo Berrettini | ITA | 6–7(4–7), 6–4, 6–4, 6–3 | 4 | 6 |
| 2021 | Women | Ashleigh Barty | Australia | Karolína Plíšková | Czechia | 6–3, 6–7(4–7), 6–3 | 3 | 1 |
| 2022 | Men | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | Nick Kyrgios | Australia | 4–6, 6–3, 6–4, 7–6(7–3) | 4 | 7 |
| 2022 | Women | Elena Rybakina | Kazakhstan | Ons Jabeur | TUN | 3–6, 6–2, 6–2 | 3 | 1 |
| 2023 | Men | Carlos Alcaraz | Spain | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | 1–6, 7–6(8–6), 6–1, 3–6, 6–4 | 5 | 1 |
| 2023 | Women | Markéta Vondroušová | Czechia | Ons Jabeur | TUN | 6–4, 6–4 | 2 | 1 |
| 2024 | Men | Carlos Alcaraz | Spain | Novak Djokovic | Serbia | 6–2, 6–2, 7–6(7–4) | 3 | 2 |
| 2024 | Women | Barbora Krejčíková | Czechia | Jasmine Paolini | ITA | 6–2, 2–6, 6–4 | 3 | 1 |
Other pages
Sources and image credits
Sources: Wimbledon history and annual men’s / women’s final records. Open Era singles, 1968–2024; no tournament in 2020. Historical country labels follow the result record. Images are credited individually to their Wikimedia Commons file and licence pages.